<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waxman-Markey bill: Crunch time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entangledalliances.com/2009/06/waxman-markey-bill-crunch-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entangledalliances.com/2009/06/waxman-markey-bill-crunch-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:01:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is America&#8217;s Climate Change Bill as good as it should be? Does it matter? &#124; Entangled Alliances</title>
		<link>http://www.entangledalliances.com/2009/06/waxman-markey-bill-crunch-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3364</link>
		<dc:creator>Is America&#8217;s Climate Change Bill as good as it should be? Does it matter? &#124; Entangled Alliances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entangledalliances.com/?p=1510#comment-3364</guid>
		<description>[...] Waxman-Markey Bill: Crunch Time    This entry was posted on Friday, July 3rd, 2009 at 23:59. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Waxman-Markey Bill: Crunch Time    This entry was posted on Friday, July 3rd, 2009 at 23:59. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Crocker</title>
		<link>http://www.entangledalliances.com/2009/06/waxman-markey-bill-crunch-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Crocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entangledalliances.com/?p=1510#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>yeah, I&#039;m not so optimistic as you that obama will step up when the bill hits the Senate, but I completely agree that this is simply the start of what will become an increasingly productive debate, even if it is a bit of a whimpering start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I&#8217;m not so optimistic as you that obama will step up when the bill hits the Senate, but I completely agree that this is simply the start of what will become an increasingly productive debate, even if it is a bit of a whimpering start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Fellingham</title>
		<link>http://www.entangledalliances.com/2009/06/waxman-markey-bill-crunch-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3056</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Fellingham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entangledalliances.com/?p=1510#comment-3056</guid>
		<description>Sure it&#039;s been gutted down a lot from where it staqrted but if no other bill on climate change related issues were passed it will still have a dramatic impact in terms of shifting the US.

~The main reason is that carbon will at last have an associated price - however small will significantly alter the ivnestment climate.

Furthermore, Obama has been working closely behind the scenes on this one or at least the white house has, but i think he&#039;s saving his influence for the senate battle ( see fivethirtyeight&#039;s coverage).

Finally, I think this is a game changer I&#039;m 100% certain this is simply the start of the climate change debate and as sceptics become increasingly isolated - the public will become increasingly open to further legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure it&#8217;s been gutted down a lot from where it staqrted but if no other bill on climate change related issues were passed it will still have a dramatic impact in terms of shifting the US.</p>
<p>~The main reason is that carbon will at last have an associated price &#8211; however small will significantly alter the ivnestment climate.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Obama has been working closely behind the scenes on this one or at least the white house has, but i think he&#8217;s saving his influence for the senate battle ( see fivethirtyeight&#8217;s coverage).</p>
<p>Finally, I think this is a game changer I&#8217;m 100% certain this is simply the start of the climate change debate and as sceptics become increasingly isolated &#8211; the public will become increasingly open to further legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Crocker</title>
		<link>http://www.entangledalliances.com/2009/06/waxman-markey-bill-crunch-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2986</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Crocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entangledalliances.com/?p=1510#comment-2986</guid>
		<description>the problem with waxman/merkley is two-fold: one, Obama isn&#039;t putting his political capital on the line, since he&#039;s completely focused on healthcate reform. two, the bill&#039;s been gutted somewhat by the agriculture committee chairman and others. it&#039;s still a good bill, but it&#039;s not a great bill; and it&#039;s now off to the senate to get gutted some more.
I guess it really suffered from being concurrent with health reform. shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the problem with waxman/merkley is two-fold: one, Obama isn&#8217;t putting his political capital on the line, since he&#8217;s completely focused on healthcate reform. two, the bill&#8217;s been gutted somewhat by the agriculture committee chairman and others. it&#8217;s still a good bill, but it&#8217;s not a great bill; and it&#8217;s now off to the senate to get gutted some more.<br />
I guess it really suffered from being concurrent with health reform. shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
